Joining forces: combining machine learning and mechanistic models to predict tumour cell density for glioblastoma patients

10 Jul. 2018, 11:30 am
30m
New Law School---105 (University of Sydney)

New Law School---105

University of Sydney

60
Oral Presentation Minisymposium: The cancer ecosystem: optimizing treatment based on evolution The cancer ecosystem: optimizing treatment based on evolution

Speaker

Kristin Swanson (Mayo Clinic)

Description

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain cancer, with poor survival that can be largely attributed to intra-tumoural heterogeneity. While these tumours are primarily monitored via contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images, these standard clinical images are known to be non-specific in their correlation with tumour cell density. This lack of relationship makes it difficult to define the specific regions of interest to target for surgery and radiation. Previous efforts have shown some promise in better interpreting these images utilizing either machine learning (ML) or mechanistic modelling independently. But methods to harness the strengths of both approaches are sorely needed to make clinically actionable progress.

Here we present a novel, first-of-its-kind, hybrid model which brings together a graph-based semi-supervised machine learning approach with a mechanistic partial differential equation model of glioblastoma growth, known as the Proliferation-Invasion (PI) model, to generate predictive tumour cell density maps with high accuracy. Our ML approach bridges cell density as quantified from image-localized biopsies with texture analysis of multiparametric MR images. To incorporate the mechanistic model, the PI model is first used to generate an independent prediction of cell density which is then introduced into the ML algorithm through a Laplacian matrix, which ensures regions with similar predictions from the PI model will have similar predictions in the final model.

We have applied our proposed ML-PI model framework to 18 patients with a total of 82 image localized biopsies. Each patient’s tumour was imaged with multi-parametric MR images, including T1-weighted, CE T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). In this cohort, our hybrid model was able to achieve higher accuracy in cell density prediction than either of the independent models (ML or PI) alone, with a mean accuracy prediction error of 0.084 vs 0.227 for PI alone and 0.220 for ML alone. We hope that with more verification, this tool can be used to not only guide spatially localized therapies such as surgery and radiation, but also help broadly in the interpretation of images for glioblastoma patients.

Primary author

Kristin Swanson (Mayo Clinic)

Co-authors

Nathan Gaw (Arizona State University) Andrea Hawkins-Daarud (Mayo Clinic) Dr Pamela R. Jackson (Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic) Kyle Singleton (Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program Mayo Clinic) Lauren DeGirolamo (Mayo Clinic) Jennifer Eschbacher (Barrow Neurological Institute) Leslie Baxter (Barrow Neurological Institute) Kris Smith (Barrow Neurological Institute) Peter Nakaji (Barrow Neurological Institute) Samuel McGee (Barrow Neurological Institute) Kamala Clark-Swanson (Mayo Clinic) Bernard Bendok (Mayo Clinic) Amylou Dueck (Mayo Clinic) Teresa Wu (Arizona State University) Jing Li (Arizona State University) Leland Hu (Mayo Clinic)

Presentation Materials

There are no materials yet.
Your browser is out of date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now

×